Does the name Fabiola Da Silva ring a bell to anybody? She's a Brazillian inline skater, and she's been dominating vert ramps for a decade or so now. I remember watching the 2000 X-Games, when she stopped competing in "women's inline" and began to compete against men-- it was exciting to see a new crack in the so-called 'glass ceiling', the unofficial barrier segregating women from men in professional fields by sticking them with lower salaries and less chance for career advancement. It's awesome to know that there are examples of women whose outstanding abilities are rewarded fairly-- but anyone who tries to convince you that problems of gender inequality are all taken care of is probably out-of-touch.
The U.S. legislation meant to combat gender inequality is called
Title IX, but its a mess of a policy that's constantly
being reinterpreted. Essentially, the law states that all sexes must
receive equal opportunity to participate in sport-- but there are
conditions about 'interest and ability' among athletes written into the
law that become problematic. Some people might say that the 'interest
and ability' among girls to play football is pretty low, and that
football should remain a male-dominated sport. Some would argue that
by providing an alternative like cheerleading or a dance team, the
interests of women are represented-- but 'interest' is a tough thing
to gauge. Are women naturally uninterested in wearing shoulder pads
and head-butting each other, or do little girls just grow up being
taught that contact sports are 'unfeminine'? More importantly, how
exactly does one gauge whether or not the 'interests and abilities' of
a particular gender are being represented? In most Title IX lawsuits,
representation is gauged by mathematical proportions of the student
body-- a great way to remove the human element from things and turn
equality into a checklist.
It wouldn't be a big deal if these arguments
were simply things that people liked to discuss and ponder in their
spare time, but there are serious issues of professional advancement
woven into Title IX. And they aren't limited to women's sports,
either. There are a number of pundits who think that Men's collegiate
gymnastics go under appreciated and underfunded-- female gymnasts'
bodies are in prime competitive condition at a young age, and skilled
female gymnasts often go to compete internationally while their male
counterparts compete at the college level, honing their skills for a
few more years-- comparing men's and women's college gymnastics is
something of an apples-to-oranges comparison, and Title IX, for all its
good intentions, complicates things further, turning athletes into numbers that are somehow supposed to be representational of their student bodies, their genders, and their sports of choice. On the brighter side, if
you get involved in an individual sport, you're a bit less likely to encounter
college or government bureaucracy. So get out your bikes, your skates,
your juggling balls and your frisbees, and lets make our own equality
outside the inefficient confines of organized sports! Let's get
disorganized!






