join

Proportional Rationality

Posted by:jameshodges on November 11, 2008 at 09:04 AM

Does the name Fabiola Da Silva ring a bell to anybody?  She's a Brazillian inline skater, and she's been dominating vert ramps for a decade or so now.  I remember watching the 2000 X-Games, when she stopped competing in "women's inline" and began to compete against men-- it was exciting to see a new crack in the so-called 'glass ceiling', the unofficial barrier segregating women from men in professional fields by sticking them with lower salaries and less chance for career advancement.  It's awesome to know that there are examples of women whose outstanding abilities are rewarded fairly-- but anyone who tries to convince you that problems of gender inequality are all taken care of is probably out-of-touch.

 


The U.S. legislation meant to combat gender inequality is called Title IX, but its a mess of a policy that's constantly being reinterpreted.  Essentially, the law states that all sexes must receive equal opportunity to participate in sport-- but there are conditions about 'interest and ability' among athletes written into the law that become problematic.  Some people might say that the 'interest and ability' among girls to play football is pretty low, and that football should remain a male-dominated sport.  Some would argue that by providing an alternative like cheerleading or a dance team, the interests of women are represented-- but 'interest' is a tough thing to gauge.  Are women naturally uninterested in wearing shoulder pads and head-butting each other, or do little girls just grow up being taught that contact sports are 'unfeminine'?  More importantly, how exactly does one gauge whether or not the 'interests and abilities' of a particular gender are being represented?  In most Title IX lawsuits, representation is gauged by mathematical proportions of the student body-- a great way to remove the human element from things and turn equality into a checklist.
 
 
  
It wouldn't be a big deal if these arguments were simply things that people liked to discuss and ponder in their spare time, but there are serious issues of professional advancement woven into Title IX.  And they aren't limited to women's sports, either.  There are a number of pundits who think that Men's collegiate gymnastics go under appreciated and underfunded-- female gymnasts' bodies are in prime competitive condition at a young age, and skilled female gymnasts often go to compete internationally while their male counterparts compete at the college level, honing their skills for a few more years-- comparing men's and women's college gymnastics is something of an apples-to-oranges comparison, and Title IX, for all its good intentions, complicates things further, turning athletes into numbers that are somehow supposed to be representational of their student bodies, their genders, and their sports of choice.  On the brighter side, if you get involved in an individual sport, you're a bit less likely to encounter college or government bureaucracy.  So get out your bikes, your skates, your juggling balls and your frisbees, and lets make our own equality outside the inefficient confines of organized sports!  Let's get disorganized!


Leave a Comment

To leave a comment you must have a YouthNoise account.
Username Need help with your password? Password

Comments (1)

    Report Inappropriate Content! By monoloco November 11, 2008 at 11:37 AM
wow what an interesting story fabiola has. i can only imagine what it must be like to be in her shoes...

rss RECENT POSTS
Free Fitness in Chicago Parks
Posted bytrinachi on Jan 05, 2009
BCS Success
Posted bygilliebean on Jan 05, 2009
TRASHed at the X Games
Posted bytrinachi on Jan 04, 2009
Ice Fishing
Posted byjameshodges on Jan 03, 2009
Braving the Cold
Posted byjameshodges on Jan 02, 2009
AUTHORS

Click an author’s name to see all of the blog posts they’ve made.

facebook myspace twitter youtube flickr
partners
© 2007 YouthNoise. All rights reserved. Search powered by google